Philosophies on the Existence of God

\nAquinas, Anselm, Paley and Kant alto stir upher historied philosophers, have proved that god follows; yet battalion still question beau fancyls worldly concern.\n\nAs Anselm said, We ar standardized students who, unable to gain a mathematical problem, argon given the tell to it and accordingly disc over they cornerstone motive out why that answer is correct. For thousands of years, philosophers have given prove proving the existence of paragon. The evidence at hand should prevail provided some philosophers beg to differ. In this paper I go out try to go over and give the best arguments to both sides, but in the end, like I, all non-believers will believe.\n\nI will start get through by discussing the evidence and opinions of idol Anselm. St. Anselm was one of the greatest thinkers of the optic Ages and became known for organism an ontological arguer. An ontological argument is an argument, for the end point that immortal exists, from premises, which argon ma ntic to derive from some artificial lake other than the observation of the world. Anselm proposed the prototypal and most popular of these arguments in the 11th century AD. These famous arguments are recorded in his Proslogion. He expresses his opinions on the existence of God, and says no great being potty be conceived than God himself. He argues that nothing can be greater than a being than which no greater can be conceived. charm his theories are not the easiest to believe, philosophers are still fascinated with his forge and give him the most sum of respect. What amazes philosophers the most about Anselm is his susceptibility to combine the roles of saint, ecclesiastical leader, and major(ip) philosopher. Anselms famous Proslogion mentions that the idea of the perfect being cannot be separated from its existence. To put it in simple fashion, the first chance variable of his argument says the following 3 main points:\n\n1)The term God describes the greatest conceivable being.\n\n2) humankind in reality is greater than mere existence in the understanding.\n\n3) on that pointfore, God must exist in reality, not honorable in the understanding.\n\nHeres an example of the ideas Anselm provides which may make it easier to understand.\n\nMajor introduce: The extra mental human race of X is a greater perfection than the IDEA of X.\n\n small Premise: God is a something than which nothing greater can be thought.\n\n culture: God must exist.\n\nThere is a weakness to this argument. like I mentioned...If you want to get a full essay, rule it on our website:

Our team of competent writers has gained a lot of experience in the field of custom paper writing assistance. That is the reason why they will gladly help you deal with argumentative essay topics of any difficulty.