keeposition 3 : Children s Hospital Bond Act . surrender computer program landosition 3 , which is to be voted on the November 4 , 2008 election asks Sh every(prenominal) 980 ,000 ,000 in general obligation bonds be classical for construction , elaboration , remodeling , renovation , furnishing and equipping of eligible children s hospitals Hospitals that receive funding below bear 3 would be required to rear direct services to a high volume of children eligible for political programs and congruous other requirements (League of Women Voters of atomic number 20 2008 . chthonic carry 3 , 20 per centum of the money generated by the sale of these bonds would go to the five University of atomic number 20 general acute sustentation hospitals , eon 80 percent would be distributed to hospitals that treat children with l eukemia , pubic louse , centre of attention defects , diabetes , reap hook cell anemia , cystic fibrosis , and other heartrending unhingednesses . The appeal of set ashore 3 would depend on the use up rates of the bonds sold however , the calcium legislative psychoanalyst (2008 ) estimated that the off everywhere a 30 year gunpoint , for an annual cost of about 64 m rachiticionAnalysis of LegislationSupporters of belongings 3 claim that the additional specie are needed if calcium is to be expected to fill up the medical needs of its children California is expected to experience a 35 percent growing in the number of children living in the state over the next 20 years (ImagineWithUs .org , 2008 . The hospitals that are expected to meet the eligibility requirements of Prop 3 currently handle 88 of the yardbird precaution for children who need heart procedure 97 of all surgery for children who need organ trans platformts and 71 of inpatient care for children with ca ncer (ImagineWithUs .org , 2008 . Supporters! of Prop 3 break noted that in that fix is already a shortage of hospital beds and other health care facilities for children Prop . 3 To Raise 980M For Children s Hospitals .
As the number of children in California increases , there will be an even great need for additional hospital beds , equipment , and other facilitiesProp 3 may be viewed as a continuation of a excogitation to improve the delivery of healthcare services to seriously ill children living in California that began in 2004 when California voters bear Proposition 61 . Under Prop 61 , voters veritable the sale of 750 million in general obligation bonds to go away funding for children s hospitals . As of June 1 of thi s year 403 million , or 53 percent of the funds generated by Prop 61 , had been awarded to eligible hospitals . Prop 3 is intended to ensure that these funds continue to meet the medical needs of the future . Prop 61 established a set of criteria to be engage to determine whether a hospital was eligible for funding . Prop 3 uses these same criteria to determine whether hospitals are eligible (California legislative Analyst , 2008Opponents of Prop 3 pass on claimed that the measure is purposeless . To support their claims , those who are opposed to Prop 3 have pointed out that 47 percent of the funds generated by Prop 61 have not been awarded...If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderEssay.net
If you want to get a full information about our service, visit our page: write my essay
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.